Darwinian indoctrination required at UCSD? Or will the other side be heard someday?

Link to: original blogpost - comments

Categories : Intelligent Design

Editor : scordova

published: vendredi 17 novembre 2006 5:22:02

I posted earlier the fact that 40% of freshman in UCSD’s sixth college reject Darwinism, and that this so alarmed administrators, drastic steps were taken to indoctrinate more students. UCSD is also the school where IDEA was born, and apparently wherever there are hotspots of interest in the topic of ID, money will be invested by some universities to try to extinguish it. See this post by Casey Luskin at evolutionnews.org, University of California, San Diego Forces All Freshmen To Attend Anti-ID Lecture.

If this is a one-sided lecture, this has constitutional issues. If, as Judge Jones ruled, ID is a religion, a University Provost has no business funding a lecture that denigrates someone’s religious beliefs, and professors have no business requiring the freshman class to have it shoved down their throats. If on the other hand, ID is science, then the Provost and professors have no business attacking it either in this manner….

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Darwinism, Religion, Science, Legal, Constitution,

Both, Casey Luskin and Salvador Scordova have problems reading. Let's help them:

"The Ground Rules of Science: Why the Judge Rulled Intelligent Design Creationism Out of Court"