Junk DNA that isn’t

Link to: original blogpost - comments

Categories : Intelligent Design

Editor : William Dembski

published: mardi 21 novembre 2006 20:39:48

I suspect that the “junk DNA” hypothesis was originally made on explicitly Darwinian grounds. Can someone provide chapter and verse? Clearly, in the absence of the Darwinian interpretation, the default assumption would have been that repetitive nucleotide sequences must have some unknown function.

Source: University of Iowa
Date: November 21, 2006

Evolution, Biology, Intelligent Design, Science, Legal,